Genesis 1:27 says “male and female he created them.”  I submit that homosexuality is unnatural
, antithetical to manhood and marriage, and a hallmark of the deterioration of societies (although it’s impolite to point that out).  It is for these reasons the subject is germane to the men’s/fathers’ movement.  While the terms, true men and manhood, are highly subjective and do not necessarily imply the deer-slayer type, they definitely exclude homosexuals (According to homosexual lore, this exclusion would attach to Walt Whitman, Frederick the Great, arguably to Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar, as well as Napoleon).

No longer “the love that dare not speak its name,” this perversion is out of the closet with a vengeance.  It’s a sign of the times.  Probably the most cognizant, articulate spokesman for that sector is Andrew Sullivan.  Paul Popenoe, President of the American Institute of Family Relations, says “Homosexuality has increased to almost epidemic proportions.”  On the other hand, despite the publicity surrounding morally defective priests buggering altar boys, less than 5% of the population is homosexual or bisexual.  Obviously therefore, the homosexual influence is far beyond what their numbers would justify. 

Such deviant sexual appetites have become cause for celebration, and critics are castigated as bigots.  Criticism is politically incorrect, usually termed “homophobia.”  But that term is a misnomer because its denotation is fear of homosexuals.  The feeling that homosexuality is wrong is not a phobia, it’s an opinion.  No one fears homosexuals; decent people are simply revolted by their disgusting sexual practices.  In writing about Episcopal Bishop Gene Robinson, the New Oxford Review had this to say, “Sticking your you-know-what up someone’s rectum is ugly, gross, smelly, unhygienic, and nauseating…”  When they do it in the streets and frighten the horses, it’s time to call a halt.  Their predilection toward pedophilia is equally disgusting.  To dignify such behavior as an “alternate life style” is like equating bestiality with kindness to animals, and to say that homosexuals “fall in love” is to grossly distort the meaning of the word “love.”

Public schools indoctrinate children on the ‘normality’ of homosexuality.  In November 2004, Congress approved a $388.4-billion budget laden with ‘pork.’  One of the more offensive items was $80,000 for the ‘San Diego Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Community Center.’  This at the behest of Rep Susan A, Davis (D. – Calif).  The budget also included a National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) grant of  $15,000 for the Iris Feminist Collective in Berkley, California.  These are just some of the many federal expenditures for nonsense causes that do more harm than good.  Occidental College in Los Angeles offers a range of nauseating claptrap including “phallologocentrism.”

The Boy Scouts of America’s creed requires boys to be “morally straight” and refers to The Creator.  They oppose homosexual scoutmasters, not out of discrimination but in protection of boys.  This offends homosexuals, atheists and the ACLU who have been attacking the Scouts for over a decade.  Fortunately, the Supreme Court upheld the Scouts’ right to free association.  But, frightened by warnings from the ACLU, the Pentagon has warned military bases not to sponsor the Scouts.  Now, it is revealed, the Pentagon is considering a legal change to its definition of sodomy.  The office of the general counsel has proposed decriminalizing consensual sodomy among adults, changing a 55-year-old policy (It seems we have cowards in charge of protecting the country).

Fortunately, the Scouts have friends demanding a return to sensibility; on February 9, 2005, the U.S. House passed by an almost unanimous vote, 418-7, a resolution (H. Con. Res. 6) urging the Defense Department to continue its long standing support of the Scouts (the 7 nay-sayers: Earl Blumenauer, D-OR; Barney Frank, D-MA; Dennis Kucinich, D-OH; Barbara Lee, D-CA; Jim McDermott, D-WA; Pete Stark, D-CA; Lynn Woolsey, D-CA).  The American Legion, of which I am a proud member, has also taken up the cause of the Scouts.

The term “gay” is another misnomer, a desperate cover-up for a sad situation.  Most homosexuals live lives of quiet desperation and self-hatred; in equating American Christian patriots with terrorists, lesbian Rosie O’Donnell seems to have projected her self-hatred onto the whole country.  Multiple studies have shown they are at a high risk of suicide.  Research also indicates very high levels of violence in relationships and of sexually-transmitted disease.  A recent report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says that from 2000 to 2003 new HIV and AIDS diagnoses, the “wages of sin,” rose 11 percent among homosexual and bisexual men, the largest victim categories (Talk about a “terrible swift sword”).  This worldwide concern is over-concern I dare say.

Like Feminists, homosexuals have hijacked the civil rights cause.  It is disingenuous to compare civil rights for homosexuals to those for minorities.  Voluntarily deviant behavior does not deserve the same considerations as involuntary skin color.  Promoting perversion as a civil right is obscene.    

It is a self-evident concept that marriage be between a man and a woman.  This principle was upheld by passage of many state referendums to that effect in the national elections of November 2004.  Demanding to have homosexual couplings afforded the dignity of marriage is to expect social approval equivalent to that between two persons of opposite sex – the Good Housekeeping seal of approval.  Their world is a state of hyper–sexuality not conducive to relationships which marriage is intended to foster; the institution is denigrated.  If such marriages become accepted the floodgates will open.  Polygamy, inter-alia, would be next.  Then Katie bar the door.  The ACLU and Libertarians are already aboard.  Further, the increasingly popular fad of homosexual parenting operates to the clear detriment of society. I’m admittedly no expert on the cause/s of homosexuality (who is?), and I have had friends, colleagues and relatives, victims of this malady.  Almost without exception, they seem to come from dysfunctional families — either an overbearing mother or father, or no father, certainly not a normal, attentive father; and almost always there is an unnatural fixation on their mothers.  It wouldn’t surprise me if lesbians likewise had either a strong attraction or revulsion toward their fathers.

The undeniable talent of many homosexuals’ may be a reaction to, or compensation for, unpleasant childhood.  Like interracial marriages, their affliction might also be caused partially by rebellion against parents, or society, or both.  Therefore it would appear that homosexuality can either be a “choice” or not.  Either way, psychiatry may be the cure.

No doubt, these words will be interpreted as “hating” homosexuals.  On the contrary, I feel sorry for them and deplore the environment that caused their affliction.  One of my favorite writers is a lesbian and I suspect a political heroine is latently so.

Send mail to Webmaster  with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2017 Men's Defense Association
Last modified: March 30, 2017